Jason Zadrozny

Campaigning for a better Ashfield

Labour have sided with phone giants against local communities

1.57.57pm UTC (GMT +0000) Sun 6th Jul 2008

LIBERAL Democrats in Ashfield have launched a stinging attack on Geoff Hoon, Labour MP for Ashfield for siding with phone company giants rather than residents in a row over the power of communities to stop inappropriately sited phone masts.

Currently, fewer restrictions govern planning applications for phone masts up to 15 metres in height, often making it difficult for councils to refuse permission for controversial proposals.

Liberal Democrats in Parliament recently moved an amendment to the Planning Bill which would have meant applications for phone masts would have required full planning permission and therefore be considered in the same way as applications for new buildings or change of use of existing ones.

But Labour MPs, including Geoff Hoon voted against the call and Conservative MPs did not bother voting at all.

"Geoff Hoon MP had the opportunity to side with local communities or with giant phone companies," said Leader of Ashfield District Council, Jason Zadrozny. "It is extremely disappointing so see that he decided to back the latter.

"The change the Liberal Democrats proposed in the House of Commons would have given residents a fighting chance to stop inappropriately sited phone masts. It would have meant the phone companies would have had to apply for full planning permission in the same way that any other business would need to.

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Comment on this news story.
Previous news story: Liberal Democrats in Ashfield back Carers' Week (Mon 9th Jun 2008).
Next news story: Local MP condemned for blocking independent audit proposals (Sun 6th Jul 2008).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
33 High St, Stanton Hill, Sutton-in-Ashfield, Notts NG17 3GG
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.